Skip to content

Comparison

UnitFull vs Cubby

One integrated platform, not a partner-API marketplace.

Built-in vs bolted-on: the difference between a platform and a partner stack

Feature comparison

AI voice agent

Cubby's AI voice is a headline feature. UnitFull also ships AI voice natively.

UnitFull: Cubby:

FMS (unit management, leases, delinquency)

UnitFull: Cubby:

Revenue management (dynamic pricing)

Cubby's revenue management is partner-integrated. UnitFull's is native.

UnitFull: Cubby: ~

Integrated payment processing

Cubby uses a partner payments provider. UnitFull uses Stripe directly.

UnitFull: Cubby: ~

Native platform (single data model)

Cubby is a marketplace model — features are partner-assembled. UnitFull builds natively.

UnitFull: Cubby: ~

Transparent published pricing

Cubby pricing is not publicly listed.

UnitFull: Cubby:

Self-serve signup / free trial

UnitFull: Cubby:

State lien-law automation

UnitFull: Cubby:

Gate overlock automation (Nokē, PTI)

UnitFull: Cubby:

Mobile-first operator UI

UnitFull: Cubby:

Tenant portal (web + mobile)

UnitFull: Cubby:

Pricing at scale

UnitFull

$5,000/mo

5 facilities, 2,500 units

All features included. No add-ons.

Cubby

$2,500 /mo

~$2,500/mo (~$1/unit single secondary estimate) — treat as estimate, no public rate card

Source: MARKETING_PRICING_DATA.md §1 — treat as estimate

Real operator quote coming — want to share yours? Share your experience →
Real operator quote coming — want to share yours? Share your experience →

The platform model vs the marketplace model

Cubby’s headline is their AI voice agent, and it’s a genuine differentiator in a category where most FMS products still recommend you answer the phone yourself. That’s a real feature solving a real problem — 30–40% of calls to staffed facilities go unanswered.

UnitFull ships AI voice too. The deeper difference is in the platform model.

Built-in vs bolted-on

Cubby is designed as a marketplace where partner integrations are assembled around a core platform. Revenue management, payments, and some features come from partner APIs. For some operators, that flexibility is valuable — you can swap a component if a better partner emerges.

The tradeoff: every partner integration is another data boundary. When something goes wrong between your FMS and your payments partner, you’re debugging an API connection, not one system. When your delinquency state machine needs to trigger a gate overlock, the signal has to cross that boundary.

UnitFull builds the stack natively. The FMS, payments, gate integrations, revenue management, and AI voice all run on the same data model. Delinquency triggers don’t cross API boundaries — they’re the same system.

The pricing estimate caveat

We don’t have a published Cubby rate card. The ~$1/unit/month estimate is a secondary source. If you have a Cubby quote, that’s the number to use. The right comparison is all-in monthly cost — including whatever Cubby charges for payments processing.

For operators who want one thing that handles everything

If your goal is to reduce vendor count and have one support line to call when something breaks, the integrated model is the answer. UnitFull’s free trial is self-serve — see for yourself before committing.

Explore the full feature set at /features. Review pricing at /pricing.

Common questions

Ready to see UnitFull in action?

30-day free. No card. No call.

Start free trial

Last verified: May 12, 2026 · Pricing data sourced from MARKETING_PRICING_DATA.md