Skip to content

Comparison

UnitFull vs Unit Trac

A low-priced FMS — then you assemble the rest. UnitFull is all-in, and runs your payments at published rates with nothing added on top.

One low-priced FMS vs one all-in platform — payments included, nothing marked up

Feature comparison

FMS (unit management, leases, delinquency)

UnitFull: Unit Trac:

Facility website included

Both include a facility website.

UnitFull: Unit Trac:

Integrated payments at published rates, to your own account

Unit Trac integrates payments, but its model centers on passing processing fees through to your customers. UnitFull runs card and ACH at published rates straight to your own Stripe account, with nothing added on top (launch pricing).

UnitFull: Unit Trac: ~

Active ACH adoption (low-cost ACH rail + nudge)

ACH is supported; the active move-tenants-to-ACH nudge that lowers the blended bill is UnitFull's.

UnitFull: Unit Trac: ~

Revenue management (dynamic pricing)

UnitFull's Pricing Intelligence recommends rate moves; you stay in control of every change.

UnitFull: Unit Trac:

Smart access (gate relay + billing-linked lockout)

Unit Trac integrates with gate/access hardware. UnitFull wires the billing↔access loop so a failed payment revokes the gate code and a payment restores it.

UnitFull: Unit Trac: ~

AI voice that transacts

UnitFull: ROADMAP · SEPT 2026 Unit Trac:

Multi-state lien-law automation

UnitFull: Unit Trac: ~

One all-in platform (no per-module vendor stack)

Unit Trac is a capable low-cost core; the advanced layer (revenue management, the wired access loop, AI voice) is where operators otherwise bolt on more vendors.

UnitFull: Unit Trac: ~

Wired together — never walled in.

One wired system doesn’t mean lock-in: your data is yours, free to export any day.

  • Open API
  • Free export
  • Bring your own processor

A low sticker for one part of the job

Unit Trac is a capable, low-priced facility-management system, and for an operator who genuinely only needs core FMS it can be a sensible choice. The honest comparison isn’t sticker vs sticker, though — it’s one low-priced tool, then the vendors you bolt around it (dynamic pricing, a billing↔gate link, call coverage, payments) vs one all-in platform that already includes them and doesn’t tax your payments. UnitFull runs card and ACH at published rates to your own Stripe account with nothing added on top, so the comparison that matters is the whole bill, not one line of it. See /features and /pricing.

Common questions

Isn't Unit Trac cheaper?

Unit Trac publishes a low per-unit sticker, and for a small operator who only needs core FMS that can be the right call. The honest comparison isn't sticker vs sticker, though — it's one low-priced tool you then surround with the pieces it doesn't do (revenue management, the wired access loop, AI voice, and payments run to your own account) vs one all-in platform that already includes them and doesn't tax your payments. We publish our price on the pricing page so you can compare the whole picture, not just the sticker.

How do payments differ?

Both integrate payments. Unit Trac's model centers on passing processing fees through to your customers. UnitFull runs card (2.9% + 30¢) and ACH (0.8%, capped) at published rates straight to your own Stripe account — nothing added on top at launch — and actively moves autopay tenants to ACH, which can cut the blended processing bill substantially (varies with ACH adoption).

Ready to see UnitFull in action?

30-day free. No card. No call.

Start free trial

See our published pricing at /pricing.